WWhichAITry via Vercel AI Gateway
Compare/head-to-head

Gemini 3 Flash vs Llama 4 405B

Cheap, fast, 2M-token context. Meanwhile, llama 4 405b: open-weights heavyweight. self-host or run anywhere.

Side-by-side

Specs

DimensionGemini 3 FlashLlama 4 405B
Provider
Google
Meta
Released
2026-01
2025-07
Context window
2M
256K
Output max
32K
16K
Input /M
$0.30
$2.70
Output /M
$1.20
$2.70
Modalities
text, image, audio, video
text, image
Open weights
no
yes
Scorecard

Dimension-by-dimension

Gemini 3 Flash
Llama 4 405B
reasoning
7.0
8.0
coding
7.0
8.0
writing
7.0
8.0
speed
10.0
6.0
value
10.0
8.0
Verdict

Which wins, by use case

Use caseWinnerWhy
codingLlama 4 405Ba coin flip on our weighted coding score
writingLlama 4 405Ba coin flip on our weighted writing score
chatGemini 3 Flasha decisive lead on our weighted chat score
agentsLlama 4 405Ba coin flip on our weighted agents score
summarizationGemini 3 Flasha decisive lead on our weighted summarization score
translationGemini 3 Flasha clear edge on our weighted translation score
reasoningLlama 4 405Ba clear edge on our weighted reasoning score
researchGemini 3 Flasha coin flip on our weighted research score
vision and multimodalGemini 3 Flasha coin flip on our weighted vision score
Cheapest AI models for bulk workloadsGemini 3 Flasha decisive lead on our weighted cheap-bulk score
Bottom line

Our take

Pick Gemini 3 Flash if you need: unbeatable cost for the context window, very fast.

Pick Llama 4 405B if you need: open weights — self-host, no vendor lock-in.

At a 500M-input / 150M-output monthly volume, Gemini 3 Flash costs roughly $330 vs Llama 4 405B at $1755. Use our calculator to plug in your own numbers.

Keep browsing

Other comparisons