WWhichAITry via Vercel AI Gateway
Compare/head-to-head

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Llama 4 405B

Sonnet strikes back. The price-performance sweet spot. Meanwhile, llama 4 405b: open-weights heavyweight. self-host or run anywhere.

Side-by-side

Specs

DimensionClaude Sonnet 4.6Llama 4 405B
Provider
Anthropic
Meta
Released
2025-12
2025-07
Context window
1M
256K
Output max
64K
16K
Input /M
$3.00
$2.70
Output /M
$15.00
$2.70
Modalities
text, image
text, image
Open weights
no
yes
Scorecard

Dimension-by-dimension

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Llama 4 405B
reasoning
9.0
8.0
coding
9.0
8.0
writing
9.0
8.0
speed
7.0
6.0
value
9.0
8.0
Verdict

Which wins, by use case

Use caseWinnerWhy
codingClaude Sonnet 4.6a clear edge on our weighted coding score
writingClaude Sonnet 4.6a clear edge on our weighted writing score
chatClaude Sonnet 4.6a clear edge on our weighted chat score
agentsClaude Sonnet 4.6a clear edge on our weighted agents score
summarizationClaude Sonnet 4.6a clear edge on our weighted summarization score
translationClaude Sonnet 4.6a clear edge on our weighted translation score
reasoningClaude Sonnet 4.6a clear edge on our weighted reasoning score
researchClaude Sonnet 4.6a clear edge on our weighted research score
vision and multimodalClaude Sonnet 4.6a clear edge on our weighted vision score
Cheapest AI models for bulk workloadsClaude Sonnet 4.6a clear edge on our weighted cheap-bulk score
Bottom line

Our take

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 if you need: excellent value per token, strong code generation.

Pick Llama 4 405B if you need: open weights — self-host, no vendor lock-in.

At a 500M-input / 150M-output monthly volume, Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs roughly $3750 vs Llama 4 405B at $1755. Use our calculator to plug in your own numbers.

Keep browsing

Other comparisons