WWhichAITry via Vercel AI Gateway
Compare/head-to-head

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 405B

Fast, cheap, surprisingly smart. Meanwhile, llama 4 405b: open-weights heavyweight. self-host or run anywhere.

Side-by-side

Specs

DimensionClaude Haiku 4.5Llama 4 405B
Provider
Anthropic
Meta
Released
2025-10
2025-07
Context window
200K
256K
Output max
8K
16K
Input /M
$1.00
$2.70
Output /M
$5.00
$2.70
Modalities
text, image
text, image
Open weights
no
yes
Scorecard

Dimension-by-dimension

Claude Haiku 4.5
Llama 4 405B
reasoning
7.0
8.0
coding
7.0
8.0
writing
8.0
8.0
speed
10.0
6.0
value
10.0
8.0
Verdict

Which wins, by use case

Use caseWinnerWhy
codingLlama 4 405Ba coin flip on our weighted coding score
writingClaude Haiku 4.5a coin flip on our weighted writing score
chatClaude Haiku 4.5a decisive lead on our weighted chat score
agentsLlama 4 405Ba coin flip on our weighted agents score
summarizationClaude Haiku 4.5a decisive lead on our weighted summarization score
translationClaude Haiku 4.5a clear edge on our weighted translation score
reasoningLlama 4 405Ba clear edge on our weighted reasoning score
researchClaude Haiku 4.5a coin flip on our weighted research score
vision and multimodalClaude Haiku 4.5a coin flip on our weighted vision score
Cheapest AI models for bulk workloadsClaude Haiku 4.5a decisive lead on our weighted cheap-bulk score
Bottom line

Our take

Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 if you need: very fast, great cost profile.

Pick Llama 4 405B if you need: open weights — self-host, no vendor lock-in.

At a 500M-input / 150M-output monthly volume, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs roughly $1250 vs Llama 4 405B at $1755. Use our calculator to plug in your own numbers.

Keep browsing

Other comparisons